去看看《商業週刊》這篇關於dji無人機優勢的負面報道吧

如果你在過去的五年裡買過，飛過，看過，甚至想過一架無人機，那很可能是DJI的四架直升機之一。事實上，根據彭博商業週刊（Bloomberg Businessweek）的一篇新專題報道，這家中國公司已經徹底消耗了消費和商用無人機市場，其主導地位現在正達到有限回報甚至可能是負回報的地步。...

如果你在過去的五年裡買過，飛過，看過，甚至想過一架無人機，那很可能是DJI的四架直升機之一。事實上，根據彭博商業週刊（Bloomberg Businessweek）的一篇新專題報道，這家中國公司已經徹底消耗了消費和商用無人機市場，其主導地位現在正達到有限回報甚至可能是負回報的地步。

這篇文章一部分是對DJI如何來到這裡的反思，一部分是對隱居的創始人兼執行長弗蘭克•王（Frank Wang）的調查’公司的管理風格，以及部分評估貿易戰和華為最近的爭議對公司的影響。但最重要的是’這是關於DJI如何將自己置於’它成為自己的主要競爭對手。也就是說：

[...] the company’s tireless drive to improve its products and lower prices has sucked so much of the profit out of the market for c***umer and corporate drones that even Wang has little choice but to fund expansi*** into cameras, robotics, and, most controversially, drones sometimes used for surveillance by big companies and government bodies. As one former employee puts it, “Frank has created a race to the bottom, and now he’s competing against himself.”

報道這篇文章的布萊克·施密特和阿什莉·萬斯解釋道’中國無情的產品週期和激進的定價使得該公司很難從中獲利。他們還深入挖掘了DJI在打造霸主地位時所採用的一些無情策略，據報道，這些策略包括在一個網路論壇上充斥來自虛假賬戶的負面評論，內容涉及另一家中國公司易恆（EHang）’他正在研究乘客無人機，並在YouTube上播放有關四架直升機公司Yuneec的影片。

儘管與地方和國家層面的**合作可能為公司帶來了一條新的收入之路，但這也讓公司走上了一些黑暗的道路。

記者發現，DJI在2017年宣佈，同意向新疆當局提供無人機，新疆有100萬***人被各級關押，並接受**的“再教育”。

他們還被告知，DJI的空中交通管制式跟蹤技術可能是從與***的互動中產生的：

While it’s not recommended—or, in most places, legal—it’s technically possible to fly DJI’s drones as high as 4 miles into the sky. Someone in China was doing exactly that—and the drone almost collided with a People’s Liberation Army Air Force fighter jet, according to two people familiar with the 2016 incident, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss it. The fighter pilot landed and was furious. He asked to check footage from a camera mounted to the plane to see if it caught images of the device, which it had. The military brought the pictures to DJI and demanded to know whose drone it was. DJI said it didn’t have a database with that sort of specific information and could provide only a general idea of devices near that location, according to one of the people familiar with the matter.

The government insisted that DJI create a type of air-traffic-control database that can identify and monitor drones flying in China. While Wang, according to former employees, isn’t a big fan of the military, he created this system rather than have the government try to build it, one of the people says.

DJI要麼否認，要麼拒絕就報道中的許多說法置評。但報告中詳述該公司據稱與中國**關係的部分，不太可能減輕美國**中一些聯邦機構出於安全考慮停止使用DJI無人機的人的擔憂。

不管怎樣，施密特和萬斯的新功能肯定會刮掉DJI市場支配地位的一些光澤。去看看吧。