这个被称为世界上第一个“控制论仇恨犯罪”的传奇继续展开。本周早些时候，史蒂夫曼博士声称，他在巴黎一家麦当劳遭到袭击，因为他拒绝摘下增强现实耳机Eyetap。昨天麦当劳否认了所谓的袭击，今天曼恩公布了新的照片，他声称这是进一步的口角证据。

曼恩的眼镜是谷歌项目玻璃等设备的前身。他声称麦当劳的工作人员要求他把它移走，因为餐厅内不准有摄像头。曼恩出示了一张医生的便条，上面写着这个装置可以随时佩戴。曼恩说，在他坐下后，工作人员找他试图从他的头上撕下眼针，暴力行为更令人不安的是，它永久附着在曼恩的头骨上，没有特殊工具就无法安全移除。

昨天，麦当劳发布了以下声明：

We share the concern regarding Dr. Mann’s account of his July 1 visit to a McDonald’s in Paris. McDonald’s France was made aware of Dr. Mann’s complaints on July 16, and immediately launched a thorough investigation. The McDonald’s France team has contacted Dr. Mann and is awaiting further information from him. In addition, several staff members involved have been interviewed individually, and all independently and c***istently expressed that their interaction with Dr. Mann was polite and did not involve a physical altercation. Our crew members and restaurant security staff have informed us that they did not damage any of Mr. Mann’s personal possessi***. While we continue to learn more about the situation, we are hearing from customers who have questi*** about what happened. We urge everyone not to speculate or jump to conclusi*** before all the facts are known. Our goal is to provide a welcoming environment and stellar service to McDonald’s customers around the world.

为了反驳这些说法，曼恩在他的博客（如上图所示）中添加了一张新照片，照片中一名男子似乎正在抓住他的眼罩。曼恩说，他的设备的默认设置是不存储图像，但它确实收集了这些图像，因为它被损坏了。

在这一点上，这仍然是一个相互矛盾的索赔案件，除了曼恩的照片没有任何证据。但这一事件凸显了未来十年肯定会出现的更深层次的问题。社会对人类使用可穿戴和嵌入式技术的反应如何？像科技伦理组织建议的那样，电子人是一个独立的群体，需要受到保护，免受仇恨言论和犯罪的侵害吗？关于隐私和监视的现行法律将如何处理那些不断记录他们所看到的一切的人？