電視史上最好的遊戲節目是危險！原因很明顯。每週有三名選手在電視上大聲回答瑣事問題，觀眾們也會在客廳裡大聲回答瑣事問題。這是電視所能做的最好的事情——在美國家庭中發起輕鬆的體育活動，併在晚間新聞後給理智主義30分鐘的時間。

出於好奇，為了確保我們最喜愛的遊戲節目不會自行消失，Verge提交了一份《資訊自由法》（Freedom of Information Act）的請求，要求FCC對Jeopardy提出投訴！因為法律只要求FCC將投訴儲存三年，所以我們收到的檔案都是2013年至今的。危險！，作為一個近乎完美的電視節目，在這段時間裡，只有7起針對它的投訴。

“實際上……”

也許是我最喜歡的關於危險的抱怨！是你所期待的一切危險！投訴。關於瑣事的爭論。

來自佛羅裡達州羅斯金的一位觀眾：

"In a $1,000 answer in regular Jeopardy, the answer was about the FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Financial Aid). The question was ‘What is required to apply to college?’ which was accepted as correct. This is incorrect. The FAFSA is only required to apply for financial aid."

陰謀論

你可以在維基百科的一個名為“20世紀50年代智力競賽節目醜聞”的頁面上看到這個投訴所指的遊戲節目，64000美元的問題。在20世紀50年代，聯邦通訊委員會發現許多受歡迎的智力競賽節目在操縱遊戲，以迎合他們的參賽者。這實際上是一個相當大的打擊，以世界各地的代表，瑣事顯示，因為他們剛剛贏得了一個重大的法律訴訟，是否玩瑣事的錢構成賭博。

今天，在所有瑣碎的遊戲節目中有沒有一個陰謀來確保沒有一個聰明的人贏得太多的錢？一位來自佛羅裡達州傑克遜維爾的觀眾認為，也許是

"During the past several years some contestants have been on the show continuously for a period of time and won large sums of money. Obviously interest in the show increases. Then all of a sudden the contestant who has won the large sum of money gives no answer or an incorrect answer and the winning comes to an abrupt end. This gives the impression that the producers of the show have a limit on the length of time a contestant can be on the show or the amount of money they can win. Kind of reminds me of the old $64,000 game show.

My question is has the FCC had any inquires concerning Jeopardy! and looked into the matter, and if so what were the findings?"

宣傳！

一位來自佛羅裡達州薩拉索塔的觀眾指出，危險！為了進一步推動全民醫療保健議程，**僅僅採取了一種遊戲表演的“偽裝”。大膽的主張！幾乎和他們聲稱的一樣大膽，他們閱讀了整個平價醫療法案，將近20000頁長。

這個觀眾還聲稱危險！在哥倫比亞廣播公司播出。

"Tonight, the CBS / Jeopardy! improperly used its entertainment platform and unfairly used PUBLIC airtime to promote and propagandize the federal government ACA / Obamacare program. Under the guise of being a gameshow, CBS / Jeopardy! violated apolitical TV standard to pimp ACA / Obamacare with slanted questi***, misleading answers in the "HEALTHCARE" category. If I wanted to watch ACA / Obamacare TV COMMERCIALS, I would OR JUST CHANGE THE CHANNEL. I read the entire ACA / Obamacare legislation, I OBJECT to Alex Trebek / CBS using the Jeopardy! gameshow to invade our home with even more ACA / Obamacare propaganda."

作為參考，本投訴所指的問題和答案，從危險事件！2013年6月26日播出：

• 800美元——根據奧巴馬醫改，大多數65歲以下、收入低於貧困線133%的人都有資格參加這項計劃(什麼是醫療補助？）
• 1200美元——醫療保險的處方藥福利覆蓋範圍有一個缺口，即支出從你的口袋裡掏出來，也就是這個可食用的名字(什麼是甜甜圈洞？）
• 1600美元-高階實踐註冊這些專業人士之一擁有碩士學位，並提供直接的患者護理(什麼是護士？）
• 2000美元——這是1996年的MHPA中的“MH”，該法律規定其保險水平與其他醫療保險相同(什麼是心理健康？）

該死的

來自北卡羅來納州羅利的一位觀眾：

"During tonight’s airing of Jeopardy!, the profane exclamation of "God Damn" was audible from one of the contestants. It occurred during the start of Double Jeopardy after the clue about a movie where Steve McQueen drives a Mustang. The answer to the question was "Bullitt," and right before the answer is given by the contestant, another can be heard saying the phrase "God Damn" at a low, but audible level. This is a pre-recorded primetime show watched by thousands. Such a phrase to be left in the airing copy is inexcusable."

隱藏字幕錯誤

兩個最嚴重的投訴指出，******，美國最大和最古老的廣播網路之一，仍然無法找出如何提供體面的閉路字幕。當Verge向NBC提交了一份關於裡約奧運會投訴的FOIA請求時，也提出了類似的問題。

來自羅德島沃裡克的一位觀眾：

"Captioning from something Alex Trebex said still remained on the screen covering the question Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor was asking, twice. There was no captioning a Cardi’s furniture commercial as there has never been captioning in any of their commercials. [And] even in the ‘captioning provided by’ spot, none of the companies that supposedly provided sp***oring for captioning even captioned their particular ads in that spot. This has actually happened in every Jeopardy! program I have watched and there are no capti***, by the way, in any of the WPRI Channel 12 News promos, nor are there any capti*** in the weather briefings during the commercials on Jeopardy! ever since I started watching the show with captioning."

從錶面上看是同一個觀眾在沃裡克，羅德島：

"I don’t pay much attention to the commercials although almost none of them are captioned even the Channel 12 weather reports and news promo, they are never captioned. [As] if people who are hearing disabled and deaf don’t matter in Rhode Island, or would have no interested in the news or the weather or whatever other reason Channel 12 always refuses to place captioning in their commercials directly involving their news coverage and weather reports...

...Since I’ve been complaining about poor captioning on the part of Verizon, either to Verizon, itself or to you, since last summer to no avail, I’m really finding that all of you are like brick walls, except that no brick wall has ever lied to the public about desiring to help them. But, if someone worth his or her salt is reading this, I will, (sigh) again, tell you in the form of a hint about what needs to be done so that corporati*** like Verizon will never ever again ignore the needs of my fellow 60,000,000 and growing hearing disabled American citizens by refusing to caption their programming and phones accurately, if at all. Simply take the simple hint that follows and you will make that change. Just as agencies in the US government won’t change unless their power is threatened significantly, businesses in the capitalist world won’t change unless their profits are threatened significantly."

我的大寫字母鎖好像壞了

來自加利福尼亞州北好萊塢的一位觀眾：

"KABC Channel 7 TV Los Angeles was airing Daytime Jeopardy! today. Alex Trebek announced what the Final Jeopardy answer was... but then that Final Jeopardy segment wasn’t aired on that TV station. At 3:54 PM local time, the station elected to go to a silly newscast about a fire. HOW STUPID IS THAT. HOW RIDICULOUS IS THAT. IT’S DISGRACEFUL TO SHOW A JEOPARDY! TV SHOW AND NOT SHOW THE SHOW’S LAST IMPORTANT SEGMENT. THAT TV STATION IS A DISGRACE TO COMMUNICATIONS. THANK YOU."

說實話，我覺得所有這些抱怨都是合理的。雖然我不認為有關美國醫療體系瑣事的問題構成“宣傳”，但我確實認為事實是危險！作家們選擇用保守派權威人士的貶義詞來引用《平價醫療法案》，這相當奇怪。我不明白為什麼各大廣播網都搞不懂閉路字幕！最重要的是，我不敢相信洛杉磯KABC第七頻道電視臺沒有播出《最後的危險》。

你是什麼，卡布奇7頻道？是通訊的恥辱？