今天，一个离奇而令人不安的故事从中国传来。《上海日报》和CNR新闻广播电台都报道说，多达数千名中国学生被从学校拉到富士康“在iPhone5上工作”。似乎有两个不同的消息来源，其中一个来源于社交网络新浪微博。该消息人士称，淮阴工学院大约有200名学生被强迫“实习”，从学校驱车前往江苏富士康工厂。这位自称是该校学生的消息人士说，这项工作从上周四开始。这名学生还说，他们每周工作6天12小时，每月工资为1550元人民币（约合244美元）。《上海日报》还报道说，该报与其他至少5所大学的“几名”学生证实了上述说法。然而，我们能找到的唯一一条微博却相当含糊，因此《上海日报》似乎联系了她进一步了解情况。

<**all>Sina Weibo post </**all>

在公平劳动协会的富士康调查报告中，富士康的实习项目受到了一些相当严厉的批评，实习生被发现与员工一样多地工作，工作时间长，有时文件松懈。FLA文件还特别规定了富士康应该做出的一系列改变，以使其实习计划符合规定，但《上海日报》报道说，一些学校在争议之后干脆干脆放弃了实习计划。

中国国家广播电台的另一篇报道称，为了满足实习的需要，一些学校甚至在接下来的一个月左右停课，并引述一位教育官员的话，这位官员似乎对该项目在学年内启动和运行感到困惑。

然而，从我们自己的研究来看，江苏富士康这家全新的工厂似乎并不是一条成品组装的生产线。这家工厂是一个零部件生产地，这就引发了一个问题：工人们怎么会知道他们在生产iphone5，因为他们肯定不会在那里组装iphone5。今年3月，蒂姆•库克参观了郑州的一条iPhone生产线。郑州是一家规模更大的工厂，员工约20万人。淮安市工厂雇用了大约35000名工人。

《上海日报》刚刚发表的第二篇报道说，那些被强行从学校拉到工厂工作的学生（据报道，工厂急需工人）现在开始重返学业。自愿申请实习的，准予留校。这篇文章从本质上证实了学生实际上是被学校拉出来填补工厂工人的空缺，并引用了一位市**官员的声明，即学校已被责令遵守实习政策并“纠正违规行为”。虽然**的声明没有澄清、证实，或否认学生提出的指控，其重申的指导方针已被解释为对违规行为的确认。

我们已经联系苹果和富士康征求意见，并将在得到更多信息后更新文章。

最新消息：富士康向我们发送了以下声明。

Foxconn has long had a short-term internship program that we carry out in cooperation with a number of vocational schools in China. Participants in the internship program, all of whom are of legal working age in China, represent an average of 2.7 percent of our workforce in China. The internship programs range in length from one to six months and students are free to leave the internship program at any time. While we provide vocational schools with our qualification requirements, it is the schools that recruit the students under the supervision of the relevant local government and the schools also assign teachers to accompany and monitor the students throughout their internship program. In addition to allowing the students to gain relevant industry experience while earning the same industry-competitive compensation as our full-time entry-level workers, this program gives Foxconn an opportunity to identify participants in the internship program who have the potential to be excellent full-time employees should they wish to join our company upon graduation from their vocational school. A recent audit of three of our facilities in China carried out by the Fair Labor Association confirmed that there was no evidence to indicate that any of the interns were pressured to participate in or to continue to participate in any internship program. A previous audit by the Fair Labor Association confirmed that students find their participation in this program valuable and that the positi*** offered by Foxconn were at compensation levels equivalent to entry-level full-time workers.