同样的团体，打倒了SOPA似乎把他们的注意力转向最近的歌利亚新闻。在谷歌起诉密西西比州总检察长之后，一个由13个**组织组成的联盟将注意力转向了最近针对谷歌的行动，并正在发出一封信，批评密西西比州总检察长吉姆·胡德（Jim Hood）在被称为“歌利亚计划”（Project Goliath）的MPAA项目中所扮演的角色。胡德已经呼吁在正在进行的法律斗争中“暂停”，但从这封信来看，许多网络自由组织对此不以为然。

---

该组织包括美国图书馆协会、消费电子协会、公共知识和电子前沿基金会，所有这些组织都积极参与反对SOPA的斗争。虽然胡德的调查仅限于作为一家公司的谷歌，但该组织呼吁推出新的网站屏蔽权力，以期通过其他方式复活SOPA。”“在联邦层面上，SOPA是个坏主意，”信中总结道，“在州层面上，任何SOPA的复兴都同样是个坏主意。”

该字母全文如下：

Dear Attorney General Hood: According to recent news reports, your office, in active coordination with the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and its member companies, has been and remains engaged in a coordinated campaign to shut down and block access to individual websites through backdoor methods resoundingly rejected by the public and federal lawmakers. Publicati*** including The New York Times, The Huffington Post, and The Verge are reporting that the MPAA responded to the failure of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in 2012 by quietly searching for alternate means to accomplish key provisi*** of the bill, such as website blocking and search filtering. It is our understanding that those efforts include developing legal theories and even drafting civil investigation demand letters for state attorneys general to facilitate acti*** against websites and search engines. The goal of these efforts mirrors the goal of SOPA: to create new legal tools that will compel online service providers to remove content from the Internet with little, if any, meaningful due process. While we recognize these reports may be incomplete, the available information nevertheless leaves us deeply concerned. As dem***trated in the debate over SOPA, compelled website blocking by online service providers poses an unjustifiable threat to the security of the Domain Name System (DNS), the basic address book of the Internet. Similarly, requiring third parties to filter the contents of DNS lookups and search results threatens the Internet as a tool and forum for free expression. Despite these risks, you told The Huffington Post you agreed with the methods of the ill­-fated SOPA legislation. We beg to differ, as do the engineers who created the internet, the organizati*** and businesses that depend upon a secure and robust internet infrastructure, and the legi*** of Internet users who spoke out against SOPA in 2011 and 2012. When Congress tried to pass SOPA in 2011­-2012, milli*** of Americans signed petiti***, called and emailed their Congressional representatives, and commented on social media platforms, all firmly opposing attempts to limit online speech by blocking websites without appropriate legal process. SOPA was a bad idea at the federal level, and any SOPA revival on a state level is an equally bad idea that, we are confident, will be equally unacceptable to the public. We have included several letters highlighting the original opposition to SOPA to remind you of the depth of the problems with this approach and the principled opposition to curtailing free speech that it first provoked. Sincerely, American Library Association Center for Democracy and Technology Computer and Communicati*** Industry Association C***umer Electronics Association Demand Progress Engine Advocacy Electronic Frontier Foundation Free Press Freedomworks New America’s Open Technology Institute Public Knowledge Roostrikers R Street