奥巴马、at&t、verizon、netflix等公司对fcc历史性的网络中立投票做出了反应

联邦通信委员会刚刚创造了历史,将宽带置于第二篇法规之下,试图永久性地维护网络中立性。这场3票对2票的投票是网络中立倡导者(决心保持互联网的自由和开放)和互联网服务提供商(isp)之间数月来反反复复的结果,后者指责联邦政府不公正地越界。随着联邦通信委员会的巨大时刻的到来,我们将在下面收集对今天投票的回应,并随着更多人的到来而更新。...

联邦通信委员会刚刚创造了历史,将宽带置于第二篇法规之下,试图永久性地维护网络中立性。这场3票对2票的投票是网络中立倡导者(决心保持互联网的自由和开放)和互联网服务提供商(isp)之间数月来反反复复的结果,后者指责联邦**不公正地越界。随着联邦通信委员会的巨大时刻的到来,我们将在下面收集对今天投票的回应,并随着更多人的到来而更新。


奥巴马总统:联邦通信委员会此举保持互联网“开放和自由”

奥巴马、at&t、verizon、netflix等公司对fcc历史性的网络中立投票做出了反应

奥巴马还特别感谢Reddit社区。

美国电话电报公司;暗示诉讼和国会会毁掉一切

Instead of a clear set of rules moving forward, with a broad set of agreement behind them, we once again face the uncertainty of litigation, and the very real potential of having to start over – again – in the future.  Partisan decisi*** taken on 3-2 votes can be undone on similarly partisan 3-2 votes only two years hence.  And FCC decisi*** made without clear authorization by Congress (and who can honestly argue Congress intended this?) can be undone quickly by Congress or the courts. This may suit partisans who lust for issues of political division, but it isn’t healthy for the Internet ecosystem, for the economy, or for our political system.  And, followed to its logical conclusion, this will do long-term damage to the FCC as well.

For our part, we will continue to seek a c***ensus solution, and hopefully bipartisan legislation, even if we are the last voice seeking agreement rather than division.  And we will hope that other voices of reason will emerge, voices who recognize that animosity, exaggeration, demonization and fear-mongering are not a basis on which to make wise national policies.

读取(&A);T的完整声明

一些共和党议员说,这正是他们将要做的

We will not stand by idly as the White House, using the FCC, attempts to advance rules that imperil the future of the internet. We plan to support and urge our colleagues to pass a Congressional Review Act resolution disapproving the "Open Internet" rules. Not only will such a resolution nullify the "Open Internet" rules, the resolution will prevent the FCC from relying on Title II for any future net neutrality rules unless Congress explicitly instructs the FCC to take such action.

阅读众议院21名共和党议员写给联邦通讯委员会主席汤姆·惠勒的信全文

verizon用打字机字体嘲弄fcc,并警告互联网“回溯星期四”

奥巴马、at&t、verizon、netflix等公司对fcc历史性的网络中立投票做出了反应

阅读Verizon的完整声明

康卡斯特不喜欢第二部

Today, the FCC voted 3-2 to adopt new Open Internet rules – rules that we support and agree should be put in place as legally enforceable by the FCC.  Unfortunately, the FCC also decided to reclassify broadband as a telecommunicati*** service under Title II of the Communicati*** Act of 1934.  We are disappointed the Commission chose this route, which is certain to lead to years of litigation and regulatory uncertainty and may greatly harm investment and innovation, when the use of Section 706 alone would have provided a much more certain and legally sustainable path.

We fully embrace the open Internet principles that have been laid out by President Obama and Chairman Wheeler and that now have been adopted by the FCC.  We just don’t believe statutory provisi*** designed for the telephone industry and adopted when Franklin D. Roosevelt was president should be stretched to govern the 21st century Internet.

[...]

After today, the only "certainty" in the Open Internet space is that we all face inevitable litigation and years of regulatory uncertainty challenging an Order that puts in place rules that most of us agree with.  We believe that the best way to avoid this would be for Congress to act.  We are confident this can be done in a bi-partisan manner with a c***ensus approach that accomplishes the common goals of stakeholders on all sides of the open Internet debate without the unnecessary focus on legal jurisdiction and the unnecessary regulatory overhang from 80 year-old language and provisi*** that were never intended to be applied to the Internet.

阅读康卡斯特的完整声明

参议员阿尔·弗兰肯想庆祝一下

This is a an enormous victory. This is the culmination of years of hard work by countless Americans who believe — just as I do — that the internet should remain the free and open platform that it’s always been.  Net neutrality is important for c***umers, for **all businesses and startups trying to compete with the big guys, and ultimately, for the innovation that has helped drive our economy for the past several decades.

[...]

I’m thrilled that the FCC has taken this crucial step. But the fight isn’t over as some Republicans are already working on legislation to undo all of this. So in the weeks and months ahead, I will continue to make sure everyone understands what’s at stake, and why we need to stand by the strong rules adopted by the FCC.

But in the meantime, let’s celebrate.

kickstarter也是

A free Internet with equal access for all is vital to a diverse and vibrant culture of open exchange. We're grateful that the FCC has heard the milli*** of voices who believe in a free and open internet. Today's step is a huge victory, however, we must remain diligent in protecting everyone's rights as citizens of the web.

netflix认为这是各地消费者的胜利,但不希望fcc忘记互联

The net neutrality debate is about who picks winners and losers online: Internet service providers or c***umers. Today, the FCC settled it:  C***umers win.

Today’s order is a meaningful step towards ensuring ISPs cannot shift bad conduct upstream to where they interconnect with content providers like Netflix. Net neutrality rules are only as strong as their weakest link, and it’s incumbent on the FCC to ensure these interconnection points aren’t used to end-run the principles of an open Internet.

Given the lack of competition among broadband providers, today’s other FCC decision preventing regulati*** that thwart local investment in new broadband infrastructure also is an important step toward ensuring greater c***umer choice. These acti*** kick off a new era that puts the c***umer, not litigious corporate giants, at the center of competition policy.

mpaa只是希望每个人都不要再流电影了

Our narrow focus throughout the network neutrality debate has been to ensure that the rules do not thwart efforts to prevent copyright infringement, or otherwise chill production and distribution of innovative content. Until we see the order we cannot know for sure, but the FCC has previously indicated that it would continue to make clear that the rules do not apply to unlawful tran**ission of content, and would refrain from regulating parties on the edge of the Internet, such as content creators.

参议员麦凯恩承诺国会将“纠正”联邦通信委员会的错误

微软很高兴,但期待“阅读规则”

We applaud the FCC’s decision to preserve the fundamentally open nature of the Internet and look forward to reading the Order and rules.

tumblr称今天是“重要的”,感谢fcc的勇敢

Today's FCC vote was a momentous one for everybody on the internet, and we couldn't be more pleased with its outcome. The majority of commissioners followed Chairman Wheeler's lead and made the brave decision to leave the internet in the hands of those who actually use it—the innovators, the entrepreneurs, and the everyday users—rather than allow it to be controlled by broadband carriers. We're also incredibly proud of the Tumblr community. When we gave them the opportunity to make their voices heard, they responded loud and clear, and their policymakers listened to what they had to say. We owe them our gratitude for helping enshrine a free, fair, and open internet for generati*** to come.

ncta和big cable非常生气

With years of uncertainty and unintended c***equences ahead of us, it falls to Congress to step in. Working together, our legislative leaders can protect an open Internet, while ensuring that it remains free for innovation without government permission and that it continues to create strong incentives to deploying ever-faster broadband to every American. The FCC has taken us in a distressing direction. We must now look to other branches of government for a more balanced resolution.

美国宽带:

Today, in a partisan 3-2 vote, the FCC has abandoned over 15 years of successful bipartisan policy that, by nearly everyone's acknowledgement, has worked exceedingly well.  The result?  Years of legal uncertainty that will chill investment and innovation in the most successful sector of our economy while likely raising new taxes and fees on middle class families.

阅读国家有线电视;美国电信协会声明全文

moveon.org非常高兴

The American people came to the table in ways we haven’t seen before on a fundamental issue that matters to each of our lives, our economy, and our democracy. Grassroots groups and activists fought tirelessly for their right to be heard, and we prevailed despite the best efforts of corporate media lobbyists.

By protecting the open Internet from big cable companies that want to limit access, this victory levels the playing field for c***umers, **all businesses, and Main Street. We are grateful for the leadership of FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler and the FCC commissioners who voted for this plan in the face of powerful interests; for President Obama, who backed the net's roots at a pivotal time in this fight; and for the milli*** of Americans who spoke out powerfully and organized on this issue.

阅读MoveOn的完整声明

电子前沿基金会声称“部分胜利”

无线运营商说,联邦通信委员会只是把我们的“5g未来”置于危险之中

The FCC’s Net Neutrality decision was disappointing and unnecessary: c***umers across the U.S. have – and will always have – access to an open mobile Internet. By ignoring the fundamental differences in wireless networks and disregarding the intense competition throughout the mobile ecosystem, the FCC abandoned a long-standing policy framework resp***ible for fostering America’s world-leading wireless industry. The FCC's claim that the mobile voice experience supports the FCC's efforts distorts history and the law, turning a deregulatory statute in 1993 on its head. Title II needlessly puts at risk our nation’s 5G future and the promise of a more connected life.

阅读CTIA的完整声明

cea认为第二篇是“错误的方法”

Today’s vote by the FCC reclassifying broadband as a Title II public utility service takes us in the wrong direction on the information superhighway. CEA supports a light regulatory regime that strikes the appropriate balance among fostering innovation, promoting competition and maintaining broad access to and across the Internet.  With this vote, the Commission has instead placed regulatory shackles and new legal risks on the Internet and those who use this technological marvel to create critical new services, products and jobs. The end result for c***umers: less choice, higher costs and reduced innovation.

阅读消费电子协会的完整声明

乌斯特康也是如此

What is remarkable is that the commission’s overreach is so unnecessary. Broadband service providers are operating in complete conformance with the open Internet standards advanced by the president, we agree with the standards, we support their adoption in regulation by the FCC under Section 706, and we support their enactment into law. We will now turn to the courts for review, and given the broad c***ensus that exists on the underlying objectives, will look forward to working with the Congress on a bipartisan basis to advance legislation.

阅读Uselecom的完整声明

电信行业协会

The uncertainty created by the FCC’s plan will jeopardize the fast pace of private sector investment and improvements.  In addition to having an immediate impact on investment, the FCC’s plan is a Trojan Horse. If Title II is not struck down by the courts, a new Administration or new Commissioners could push the FCC to implement the full, heavy-handed regulatory authority it provides.

[...]

We are confident that Title II regulation will be rejected as Congress, the courts and c***umers fully understand how it will hold back investment, innovation and growth. While we support the coming legal challenges, our plan is to work with Congress to find a reasonable, balanced approach to an open Internet.

观看TIA首席执行官Scott Belcher对今天FCC投票表示失望的视频

  • 发表于 2021-04-29 03:35
  • 阅读 ( 130 )
  • 分类:互联网

你可能感兴趣的文章

网络中立解释:这就是互联网将要发生的事情

...络中立是民主党人支持而共和党人不支持的。尽管巴拉克奥巴马(Barack Obama)在网络中立成立时就任总统,但其根源却远不止于此。虽然有些人可能认为,将宽带归类为第二类服务并不是保持网络中立性的方法,但这不是本文的...

  • 发布于 2021-03-12 06:50
  • 阅读 ( 212 )

复仇的光谱:联邦通信委员会如何受到国会和美国电话电报公司的攻击

...器库中的关键监管工具。我们听说,这项法案在参议院或奥巴马总统的办公桌上都没有机会,但众议院领导人仍然推动它通过,以表明自己的观点。如果通过,HR 3309将: 要求联邦通信委员会在投票前提供规则全文供公众评论 ...

  • 发布于 2021-04-21 18:47
  • 阅读 ( 220 )

是时候让联邦通信委员会为美国人挺身而出,而不是破坏互联网了

...卡斯特(Comcast)、美国电话电报公司(AT&T、 而Verizon将成为把关人,为那些为互联网用户的特殊访问付费最多的公司提供优惠待遇。
 
 怯懦和共谋折磨着联邦通信委员会
 如果怯懦导致FCC输掉了第一场重大的网...

  • 发布于 2021-04-26 09:03
  • 阅读 ( 183 )

奥巴马能为网络中立做些什么?

...惠勒的车道,谴责最新的一系列规定。而现在,美国总统奥巴马敦促联邦通信委员会采取立场,把宽带更像是一个公用事业而不是一个门户网站。
 奥巴马松散的四点建议对大多数网络中立支持者来说是一个福音:...

  • 发布于 2021-04-27 20:35
  • 阅读 ( 220 )

6个理由真正的保守派应该藐视共和党,支持网络中立

...将冲击FCC,因为它正在权衡网络中立监管的选择。今天,奥巴马总统放弃了他不插手的做法,强烈敦促该机构采纳《电信法》中最严格的条款,这将更像是对公共事业公司的实际监管。这种参与是有代价的;奥巴马对这一问题的...

  • 发布于 2021-04-27 20:46
  • 阅读 ( 151 )

联邦通信委员会主席可能会拒绝奥巴马的网络中立计划

昨天,奥巴马总统在网络中立方面采取了强硬立场,支持呼吁更像公用事业一样监管互联网。不到24小时后,FCC负责人汤姆·惠勒表示,他将打破总统的提议,朝着旨在安抚Comcast、AT&等大型互联网提供商的新方向发展;T...

  • 发布于 2021-04-27 21:08
  • 阅读 ( 178 )

verizon高管说,他相信fcc将在网络中立性问题上做出“正确的决定”

...“正确的决定”——这清楚地表明,FCC最终将选择使用比奥巴马总统期待的要轻得多的触控方式。”据路透社报道,Verizon首席财务官Fran Shammo今早对投资者表示:“我认为FCC的独立机构将做出正确的决定。”他重申了自己对互联...

  • 发布于 2021-04-27 21:15
  • 阅读 ( 170 )

psa:网络中立不是奥巴马粉碎美国创新的秘密计划

...结果以压倒性优势否决了规模更大、更具侵扰性的**,但奥巴马总统更倾向于左翼,公开要求联邦通信委员会采取可以想象的最激进的行动。”将互联网简化为‘公共事业’,征收全面的新税,摧毁私人投资、竞争和创新,同时...

  • 发布于 2021-04-28 23:00
  • 阅读 ( 140 )

隐藏在网络中立中的移动革命

几天来,我一直在努力写上周历史性的网络中立投票。我已经写了很多关于这个话题的文章,最终看到投票将宽带重新归类为第二类服务,几乎就像是遥不可及的事情,在下一场恶战之前的一段平静。在Verizon提起诉讼之前,关...

  • 发布于 2021-04-29 04:23
  • 阅读 ( 146 )

t-mobile可以让你在不消耗数据的情况下流式传输netflix和hbo

...表示,大肆挥霍应该有助于他的公司从竞争对手AT&T和Verizon那里争取到更多的客户,而这两家公司在美国用户中领先于T-Mobile“美国的大多数航空公司甚至不想涉足这一行业,但他们陷入了困境,”Legere说有一种方法可以让他...

  • 发布于 2021-05-02 10:05
  • 阅读 ( 179 )
cwpo0909
cwpo0909

0 篇文章

相关推荐